Account: Difference between revisions

From ETM
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




<a class="image" title="Hover info of a Transaction"><img alt="Hover info of a Transaction" src="/images/6/67/Transaction.png" decoding="async" style="vertical-align: middle" class="thumbborder" data-file-width="829" data-file-height="201" width="829" height="201"></a>
 


Decide if account numbers should be in order per user or not (anonymity)
Decide if account numbers should be in order per user or not (anonymity)
* In the real world there is no "index" of account numbers and no "this account is owned by X"
* In the real world there is no "index" of account numbers and no "this account is owned by X"
* We could intentionally hide the account in general except if getting a transaction or sending money
* We could intentionally hide the account in general except if getting a transaction or sending money
Line 14: Line 13:
** Shops would not need an account on the sign
** Shops would not need an account on the sign
** Shops probably will have a "VIP" feature with named accounts anyway that needs to be activated (trademarks)
** Shops probably will have a "VIP" feature with named accounts anyway that needs to be activated (trademarks)


<pre class="mw_paragraph">examples = {"pay Kade 5",<br />    "pay Kade:test 5 thanks for shopping!",<br />    "pay :myacc 5",<br />    "pay *100056 5 why u always lyin?",<br />    "pay Kade:5034 5"}</pre>
<pre class="mw_paragraph">examples = {"pay Kade 5",<br />    "pay Kade:test 5 thanks for shopping!",<br />    "pay :myacc 5",<br />    "pay *100056 5 why u always lyin?",<br />    "pay Kade:5034 5"}</pre>

Revision as of 00:21, 14 March 2020

Accounts

Hover info of a Transaction
Hover info of a Transaction



Decide if account numbers should be in order per user or not (anonymity)

  • In the real world there is no "index" of account numbers and no "this account is owned by X"
  • We could intentionally hide the account in general except if getting a transaction or sending money
  • Sending money without account number would still work
    • /money pay [playername]
      This would only expose the main-account of the user. Not secondary "hidden" accounts.
    • Hiding accounts might be a nice feature
    • Shops would not need an account on the sign
    • Shops probably will have a "VIP" feature with named accounts anyway that needs to be activated (trademarks)


examples = {"pay Kade 5",<br />    "pay Kade:test 5 thanks for shopping!",<br />    "pay :myacc 5",<br />    "pay *100056 5 why u always lyin?",<br />    "pay Kade:5034 5"}